Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Scoop: Trump denies 9 former Biden aides executive privilege [View all]
Source: Axios
10 hours ago
The Trump White House has decided that nine former senior Biden aides won't be protected by executive privilege during their interviews for a congressional probe into Joe Biden's mental fitness for office.
Why it matters: The White House's move means the former Biden aides will have to answer questions about their private conversations with Biden, unless they or Biden try to challenge the decision in court.
Republicans have launched four separate investigations into Biden, 82. They're examining whether his declining health affected his abilities in the White House, and allegations that his staff helped cover up his decline.
Driving the news: Trump's White House sent a letter Tuesday waiving executive privilege for former adviser Neera Tanden, according to a White House official.
The White House told Tanden's lawyers that invoking executive privilege is not "in the national interest" given the "exceptional circumstances," according to a copy of the letter obtained by Axios.
Trump has decided to do the same for eight other former top Biden aides the GOP-led House Oversight Committee plans to interview.
They include Jill Biden's adviser Anthony Bernal along with Joe Biden's advisers Annie Tomasini, Ashley Williams, Mike Donilon, Anita Dunn, Ron Klain, Bruce Reed and Steve Ricchetti, a person familiar with the matter told Axios.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/2025/06/25/biden-investigation-congress-aides-executive-privilege
27 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Who the f*#k decided that only TSF can define what is or is not in the 'national interest' or 'national security'?
sinkingfeeling
Jun 25
#4
Cause congress and the Supreme Court has decided that he is the king and the second coming.
LiberalArkie
Jun 25
#10
Republicans do what they want, and they never apologize for pushing the guardrails aside.
chia
Jun 25
#17
ironically, that is already floating through the appeals process w/Bannon & Navarro
cadoman
Jun 25
#11
from what I can tell, the legality of this privilege remains undecided, both Bannon and Navarro went to prison for it
cadoman
Jun 25
#9
Bannon wasn't in the administration during the time period leading up to J6
BumRushDaShow
Jun 25
#13
true but his case involved another salient point: TFG did invoke executive privilege w/respect to Bannon's conversations
cadoman
Jun 25
#15