Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,331 posts)
11. Hauling her in for questioning could indeed be extremely useful
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 10:57 PM
Saturday

She's already been convicted of perjury, so why would you automatically believe anything she said - including the claim she would plead the fifth to every question - that statement wasn't even made under oath. SHe very well could be lying about that in order to try to avoid being put into a very uncomfortable situation. She can only legally plead the fifth to protect herself against self incrimination. She could not legally refuse to answer questions about other people just to protect them. Having to answer questions about other people would likely open her up to additional perjury charges (if she lies) or put her in danger (if she tells the truth).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House committee unlikely ...»Reply #11