Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(163,811 posts)

29. Well I'm guessing because of the novel and convoluted way

Mon Nov 24, 2025, 03:54 PM

20 hrs ago

the 45 admin has been handling these U.S. Attorney appointments and there really hasn't been any SCOTUS precedent ruling for what should be considered a clearly illegal circumstance.

Hell - they have been trying to disqualify Jack Smith (not understanding the difference between "principal officers" and "inferior officers", where Garland appointed Smith as an "inferior officer", in contrast to what they have been doing - appointing new "Actings" when the temp's appointee's detail expires (in some cases, appointing someone who didn't even work in the office), and then lofting them into all the duties of a "principal" officer-equivalent of a U.S. Attorney. And worse, Bondi apparently "retroactively-approved" this mess and called it "done".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ancianita ananda

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge dismisses indictments against Letitia James and James Comey, saying Lindsey Halligan appointment was unlaw [View all] LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago OP

LOL! JoseBalow 23 hrs ago #1

Beat me by 2 minutes! BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #2

You usually beat me LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #4

I get billions of "breaking news" banners all day and night from the news apps BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #11

I really appreciate your daily news posts thought crime 23 hrs ago #5

Thanks! They promised to "flood the zone" and they have! BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #12

Comey case dismissed without prejudice. Halligan invalidly appointed, judge rules LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #3

The most incompetent administration ever. Nittersing 23 hrs ago #7

They should have dismissed "with prejudice" BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #13

I know. I'm definitely not happy with the without prejudice part. ananda 22 hrs ago #19

Well I'm guessing because of the novel and convoluted way BumRushDaShow 20 hrs ago #29

They are not operating as upholders of the law or Constitution... ananda 20 hrs ago #30

Pound sand, Bondi! It's always loyalty over competence when dealing with the toddler-in-chief surfered 23 hrs ago #6

Judge dismisses cases against James Comey and Letitia James after finding prosecutor was unlawfully appointed LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #8

This message was self-deleted by its author ificandream 23 hrs ago #9

Woo hoo! mcar 23 hrs ago #10

Appeal in 10, 9, 8 .... sinkingfeeling 23 hrs ago #14

What's to appeal? The prosecutors messed up, they can't appeal this ruling FakeNoose 22 hrs ago #17

DOJ has to appeal. Du916 22 hrs ago #22

Love your "you can beat a dead horse" analogy..... ProudMNDemocrat 21 hrs ago #25

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143571440 sinkingfeeling 5 hrs ago #31

Link to orders (PDFs) BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #15

DOJ bromeando 22 hrs ago #16

LOL@MAGA RedWhiteBlueIsRacist 22 hrs ago #18

"without prejudice" Of, fer chris' sake! Grins 22 hrs ago #20

Veryn Happy here. So is it possible for Letitia to proceed against TSF? bluestarone 22 hrs ago #21

Judge Currie basically slams the door on re-indicting Comey here. LetMyPeopleVote 22 hrs ago #23

Great News... TY LMPV! Cha 21 hrs ago #24

Only way Comey gets charged is if this ruling is overturned IbogaProject 21 hrs ago #26

"Without prejudice" LiberalLovinLug 21 hrs ago #27

Did trump choose her for her looks Coldwater 20 hrs ago #28

But did it get her a gig on Fox? That is the important question. travelingthrulife 1 hr ago #32

Deadline Legal Blog-Judge dismisses Comey and James indictments, says Halligan unlawfully appointed LetMyPeopleVote 17 min ago #33